Keeping up with Kea

Department of Conservation —  15/07/2020

In the world of conservation, species management at a population level is very different to that at an individual level — especially when it comes to our beloved alpine parrots and their notorious curiosity. This is a deep dive into our programme of work for kea, and the evidence-based decision making within it.

Jaunty kea, 📸: Sabine Bernert

Our staff are passionate about what they do.

And, honestly, the word passionate undercooks it a bit.

The team are knowledgeable, enthusiastic, committed, and deliberate; and above all, determined to halt the decline of New Zealand’s critically at-risk native species and protect our natural biodiversity. It’s a goal shared by all conservationists, volunteers and scientists, as well as members of the public.

The trick is managing for multiple conservation outcomes, especially in cases where we need to protect different species in the same habitat.

That’s where DOC has a palette of hard choices.

We’re the agency charged with conserving Aotearoa’s natural and historic heritage. And make no mistake, our biodiversity is in crisis, with more than 4,000 of our native animals and plants threatened or at risk. The most damaging animal pests are possums, rats, stoats and feral cats.

In large, remote, inaccessible areas; predators like stoats are absolutely running rampant and wreaking havoc on precious taonga species. Take for instance:

Monitoring and measuring bats at Knobs Flat, 📸: Sabine Bernert

Pekapeka/bats, our tiny native land mammal! They’re in serious danger of extinction.

Kākāriki karaka, 📸: Sabine Bernert

Kākāriki karaka/orange-fronted parakeet, our rarest parakeet! There’s only 100-300 left.

Kiwi chick, 📸: Sabine Bernert

Kiwi, our flightless icon! Of which we’re losing 2% of our unmanaged birds every year.

To manage these precious species, we have some tough choices in front of us. All of our decision-making is evidence-based, fuelled by research, and made in conjunction with partners — because conservation is too important to do any other way.

Not all of our decisions are universally popular – although by and large, the majority of the New Zealand public understand that doing nothing is not an option.

Although it’s never straight forward.

Research on kea and 1080

Like kiwi, the kea population is seriously threatened by stoat predation. Kea nest in holes in the ground that are easy for stoats to find and get in to. Nest failure climbs to more than 90% in a stoat plague, which is the year after beech or rimu forest seeding.

Kea at the Chasm Walkway, 📸: Thomas Hamill

Kea are clever, curious birds, and a taonga species of cultural significance and importance to Ngāi Tahu.

They also take trolling to a new level – one kea learned to turn on the water tap at the Aspiring Hut campground; another locked a mountaineer inside the toilet at Mueller Hut; and one more lifted about NZ$1300 cash from a tourist’s campervan when it was left unattended.

They’re the Einsteins of the ngahere/forest that’s for sure.

Kea playing with a road cone, 📸: Andrew Walmsley

Aerial 1080 is the only proven predator control tool we have available to treat the rugged and remote habitat kea call home.

Research shows the success of kea in raising young following a beech mast is high after aerial 1080 predator control (about 70%), but very low without it (about 10%).

Long term studies of kea populations have proven an overall benefit from 1080 predator control after a forest mast (seeding) event, despite the loss of some individual birds.

Which is to say: at a species level, kea benefit from aerial 1080.

But at an individual level, it’s more difficult because – well, they’re kea, and they get into everything.

Kea tamper with (and get caught in) traps; they get lead poisoning from eating nails and flashings off buildings; they play in traffic in high-visitation sites; and they put pretty much everything in their mouths.

Kea biting a car tire, 📸 Shellie Evans
Kea biting window lining (a favourite pastime of theirs) 📸 Shellie Evans
Kea with a cigarette 📸: Marisa Galitz, Creative Commons

And, unfortunately, some birds have eaten 1080 pellets as well.

It’s like when a few bad eggs ruin something for everyone else – except no kea are bad eggs, they’re either just highly inquisitive birds, or they’re doing what we’ve taught them.

In places where kea have become accustomed to finding non-natural food (things left behind by people — think lollies, rubbish, leftover lunch, etc etc), some of them are far more likely to pick up a brightly coloured bait.

Scrounging is learned behaviour. And kea are very quick learners.

Kea untying a tramper’s laces, 📸: Andrew Walmsley

The situation can be summarised as this: we have a population of notorious avian scroungers at risk of extinction due to predators; a few of whom have scrounged the pellets which can control the predator numbers and save the whole species.

It’s conservation catch 22.

DOC-led research published in 2019 reviewed kea survivorship through 19 aerial 1080 operations between 2008 and 2016. Almost all deaths occurred in operations within 20km of scrounging sites, and/or where there had been no recent use of 1080. Meaning if kea are accustomed to scrounging, they’re more likely to do it to baits; and we’re working to understand why they occurred in areas with no recent use.

In new treatment areas, it’s much harder to predict what kea will do. That’s why we are trying to monitor the relationship between kea that scrounge, or have been exposed to 1080 before, and whether or not they eat the bait.

While we’re working on how to protect this species, you can help by not feeding individual birds, and making sure there’s no litter left behind in the environment.

Kea perched on a ‘do not feed the kea’ sign, 📸: Andrew Walmsley

Since 2014, there have been three revisions of the Code of Practice for Aerial 1080 in Kea Habitat (a publicly available document designed to make the best use of aerially applied 1080 while minimising negative impacts on kea populations long term) and each revision has been in response to new evidence. The third edition, released at the beginning of 2020, was in response to the new evidence that identified likely causes of why kea deaths occur in some operations but not others.

The Wet Jacket Operation

Last month we completed a (long-awaited) aerial 1080 operation at the Wet Jacket peninsula in Fiordland to protect tokoeka kiwi from stoats.

The need for this operation was urgent.

Over three years, our team conducted intensive monitoring of critically rare Fiordland tokoeka kiwi nests to evaluate the impact of stoats. It was part of the Save Our Iconic Kiwi programme, which you may have read about in our blog series: The Fiordland Kiwi Diaries.

Tokoeka kiwi chick, 📸: Crystal Brindle, DOC

The blogs in the Fiordland Kiwi Diaries series are a must read. They document the monitoring of 34 kiwi chicks in the Shy Lake area over 3 years.

And not a single kiwi chick survived.

This was virtually always due to stoat predation (in about 88% of cases, the chick was killed by a stoat — which is 30/34 chicks).

Waimarie, the first kiwi chick, 📸: DOC

This is Waimarie, the first chick discovered. She was killed by a stoat when she was only about 20 days old.

Rinse and repeat for pretty much every single chick.

It was heart breaking.

If it were to continue without intervention, there would be no future for this taonga species, the tokoeka kiwi.

The Wet Jacket aerial 1080 operation was crucial for kiwi survival, but it was also an opportunity to fill gaps in our kea research because the remoteness gave us intel on whether kea unaccustomed to scavenging would still be inclined to pick up baits.

What we learned

Since 2019, we’ve been monitoring 21 kea in the Shy Lake area using radio transmitters, although only 6 transmitters were still active prior to the operation. (The others may have fallen off, malfunctioned or the birds been killed by predators) and we are continuing to monitor kea in the area in coming weeks.

Sadly, three monitored kea died following the operation, and post-mortem and toxicology testing confirmed 1080 as cause of death.

The proof that some kea will still eat baits even if they’re not from scrounge sites or acclimatised to the scrounger life is a significant development.

Wet Jacket taught us that more research is required to understand kea behaviour (our current focus is around threat mitigation and adaptive management) to protect as many birds as possible during an aerial 1080 operation.

While we (obviously) don’t like losing individual kea, we know that at a population level, kea do better with 1080 predator control than without it, and this operation was necessary to prevent kea and Fiordland tokoeka kiwi from being decimated by stoats.

There are possible kea deterrents like anthraquinone, an agent that make kea feel sick, or leaving out tahr carcus as a decoy (which basically works by being like a massive, ‘hey kea, over here, eat this instead!’ sign).

The tahr distraction technique shows promise, but these mitigation methods need to be properly trialled, including understanding differing variables like time of year, altitude, and ensuring the kea population in the area are radio-tagged. We’re looking to trial this method in an upcoming operation.

While we’re working to improve practice and drive down risk, aerial 1080 is the only proven tool we have available to manage the number one threat to kea over its expansive rugged mountain and forest habitat. There’s nothing else right now that we can deploy with our available resources at a scale able to provide population benefits to kea – and kiwi, and pekapeka and native flora and fauna.

Kea in its mountain habitat, 📸: Dick Veitch

At the end of the day

Our biodiversity crisis is serious, and the road to recovery is paved with tough choices.

It’s critical that when we make these choices, we’re well informed, and can confidently say that the pros outweigh the cons.

Research is ongoing to make sure we’re learning as much as we can and have hard evidence to inform our decision making. Because ultimately, we need to pull out all the stops to halt the decline of New Zealand’s critically at-risk native species.

There’s simply no time to lose.

To learn about our predator control work and innovations underway, get to reading at:

For the full picture of our kea research, the Code of Practice for Aerial 1080 in Kea Habitat is the ultimate resource:


8 responses to Keeping up with Kea


    I can get it! You should stop using 1080 then the birds would at least have a chance to survive. Sure some will die,but not as many as being killed by this Poison.

    Patricia Turner 14/10/2020 at 9:33 am

    50% of the monitored kea were killed by 1080 poison in the Wet Jacket Peninsula 1080 poison drop. There is no way that sort of death rate can increase the kea population. And there is no consideration of the reproductive effects of sublethal doses.

    Paula Roberts 17/07/2020 at 7:59 am

    Thanks for putting the pros and cons of 1080 in a scientific fact based narrative. DOC and other organisations needs more resources for more research on better alternatives to 1080 instead of simplistic Ban 1080 slogans.


    Great informative piece Adam, as always. Thank you.


    Kia are evil!!

    Chris Talbot 15/07/2020 at 9:20 pm

    Seems strange that Kea are killed by 1080 and that’s okay. Sounds like you spend a lot of time justifying an indiscriminate poison that kills the Kea and many other native/indigenous birds.
    We know it kills birds by the dead birds on the ground after a poison drop.
    Logic tells you many more die that aren’t seen.
    You guys can’t know how many Kea without transmitters die. Again logic says they also die from 1080.
    But hey just keep doing the same thing and watch the continued decline in Kea numbers.
    Going by figures you are quoting there should be Kea population explosions.


    Thank you for all your information about these amazing Keas!

Trackbacks and Pingbacks:

  1. Fiordland Kiwi Diaries: Season Summary | Conservation blog Conservation blog - September 5, 2020

    […] There is a downside to this op that we need to face. We were gutted to discover that some of our monitored kea in the area ate the pellets and died. Research has shown that the stoat control will increase kea nesting success to the point where it outweighs this mortality, and it’ll be good for the population overall.  But that’s no consolation to the unlucky ones that died, and it still doesn’t make it sit well.  At the moment, we just don’t have a better alternative for this remote and rugged area, and I’m looking forward to seeing what solutions the next few years may bring. Kea conservation is complex and you can read more in this blog. […]